Authors:
Tabassum Feroz,Uzma Nawaz,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2021.07.00006Keywords:
Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE),Filtering and Thresholding Techniques,Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN),Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR),Fast ICA,Whitening,Centering,Abstract
This study proposed a correlation analysis of two recent approaches. The FAST ICA technique is used for the separation of the multimodal data (i.e, mixture of audio, noise and image signal) and the minimum mean-square error (MMSE) is used for the removal of white noise from the audio signal. Initially, multimodal data will be formed by combining all the three signals (i.e. a mixture of audio, noise and image signals). For creating an ideal situation and for SNR comparisons, separation of the signals will be performed using the Fast ICA technique. ICA, Independent element analysis is a recently developed technique in which the goal is to seek a linear interpretation of non-Gaussian knowledge for the elements to be as statistically free as possible. Such representations record the key structure of the data in several applications, including signal quality and signal separation. ICA learns a linear decay of the data. ICA can find the basic elements and sources included in the data found where traditional methods fail. After the separation of the mixed data, denoising will be performed using the MMSE technique. The main purpose of the MMSE technique is to remove White Noise from the unmixed audio signal which will be further used for overall and segmental SNR comparisons for quality enhancement. Based on the designed algorithms, both of these techniques are real-time data-driven programs. These techniques are explored with standard De-noising methods using several different estimation methods like signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Experimental results prove that the proposed MMSE technique works well for both noise segmentation and overall consideration of noise distortion signals. These statistical techniques can be used in many applications, such as in different communication systems to eliminate background noise and in channels to reduce channel interference between different applications in speech communicationsRefference:
I. A Rapid Match Algorithm for Continuous Speech Recognition by Laurence S. Gillick and Robert Roth Dragon Systems, Inc. 90 Bridge St. Newton MA. 02158.
II. A. Ravi, Leela Satyanarayana. V., : GREY WOLF OPTIMIZATION WITH WAVELET SCHEME FOR SAR IMAGES DENOISING. J. Mech. Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.-5, September-October (2019) pp 558-570. DOI : 10.26782/jmcms.2019.10.00040.
III. Blind Separation of Sources: A Non-Linear Neural Algorithm Gilles BUREL (1992).
IV. D. Marr; E. Hildreth Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 207, No. 1167. (Feb. 29, 1980), pp. 187-217
V. Elad m. 2002 ways to improve bilateral filter IEEE trans on image processing 11(10) pg 1141-1151.
VI. E. Abreu, M. Lightstone, S. K. Mitra, and K. Arakawa, A new efficient approach for the removal of white noise from highly corrupted images, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 10121025, 1996.
VII. Gonzalez, Woods, and Richard E. Woods. ”Eddins, Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB.” Third New Jersey: Prentice Hall (2004).
VIII. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-2, Issue-5, June 2013.
IX. Independent component analysis, A new concept Pierre Comon (1994).
X. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology by Jean Serra, ISBN 0-12-637240-3 (1982).
XI. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, ISSN: 2321-8169 Volume: 2 Issue: 6 1657 – 1661.
XII. J Portilla, V Strela, M Wainwright, and E P Simon celli, “Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing., In Press. 2003.
XIII. L. Rudin, S. Osher, E. Fatemi Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms Physica D, 60 (1992), pp. 259–268.
XIV. Michael, Weeks. ”Digital Signal Processing Using MATLAB .”Pearsonpublications, ISBN81-297-0272-X 2.13 (2011): 15-16.
XV. Motwani M. C., Gadiya M. C., Motwani R. C. and Jr. Harris F. C. (2004), Survey of image denoising techniques, Proceedings of Global Signal Processing Expo andConference (GSPx 04),, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
XVI. Mallat, S., 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 11, 674–693.
XVII. P. Mrazek, J. Weickert, and A. Bruhn. Geometric Properties from Incomplete Data, chapter On Robust Estimation and Smoothing with Spatial and Tonal Kernels. Springer, 2006.
XVIII. P. Prandoni, “Optimal Segmentation Techniques for Piecewise Stationary Signals,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland (1999).
XIX. PietroPerona and Jitendra Malik (July 1990). “Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence pg 629–639.
XX. Rafael C. Gonzalez, Richard E. Woods, Steven L. Eddins. Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB [M]. McGraw-Hill Press, 2011.
XXI. Scott E Umbaugh, Computer Vision and Image Processing, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey, 1998.
XXII. S. H. Chung and R. A. Kennedy, “Forward-Backward Nonlinear Filtering Signals from Noise, “Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 40, pp. 71-86, 1991.
XXIII. Utpal Barman, Ridip Dev Choudhury. : ‘Prediction of Soil pH using Smartphone based Digital Image Processing and Prediction Algorithm’. J.Mech.Cont.& Math. Sci., Vol.-14, No.2, March-April (2019) pp 226-249. DOI : 10.26782/jmcms.2019.04.00019.
XXIV. Wayne Niblack, An Introduction to Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, NewJersey, 1986.filter, IEEE Xplore PDCAT pp.826-828.