All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences (JMCMS) undergo an initial evaluation to assess their relevance to the journal’s scope, applicability, and baseline quality standards. Submissions that meet these criteria are advanced to the formal peer review stage.
The process of JMCMS employs the double-blind peer-review system, where the names of the authors and the reviewers are hidden in order to ensure objectivity in the evaluation of the manuscripts submitted.
Manuscripts that are found suitable following the first stage of editing are generally sent to two reviewers who are specialised in the relevant subjects. Reviewers are chosen keeping in mind their qualifications and expertise in the area, along with high standards in scholarly publishing. The reviewers consider the originality, scientific quality, methodology, relevance, and contributions of the manuscript.
In case of disagreement regarding the decision for acceptance or rejection between the two reviewers, a third reviewer is invited to review the same paper.
The decision on the basis of whether to accept, reject, or revise the manuscript is ultimately taken by the Editor-in-Chief after considering the reviews received.
The standard review period is approximately 8 to 10 weeks. However, this timeframe may vary depending on the manuscript’s complexity and reviewer availability.
Based on the peer review, one of the following recommendations is made:
- Unconditional Acceptance: The manuscript is accepted, with or without minor editorial revisions.
- Conditional Acceptance: Authors are requested to revise the manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is made.
- Rejection in Current Form: The manuscript is rejected in its current version, but the authors may be invited to revise and resubmit following significant improvements.
- Outright Rejection: The manuscript is rejected due to fundamental issues such as lack of originality, inadequate contribution, or major technical or methodological flaws.
The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection rests solely with the Editorial Board, following a review of all reports and revisions.8
