Gamini Suresh,K.Balakrishna Reddy, M.Nagarjuna,



Shank-foot manipulator, Control,Desired Trajectory generation,


Exoskeletons and external assistive devices for human locomotion plays an predominant role in now a days. To assist elderly people and injured content, a shank foot manipulator is modelled and analysed. This shank foot manipulator is a 2 degree of freedom link which is represented by dynamic equation of non linear differential equation. Numerical solution is employed to obtain the closed form solutions. The trajectory generated by the manipulator is discussed with the control strategies like computed torque control with the use of MATLAB. Due to the uncertainties and non linearity nature, it becomes complex to attain the motion control in a accurate position. With the ease of computed torque control, the manipulator is made to be in a desired position.


I. Merabet, A. & Gu, J. 2010. Advanced Nonlinear Control of Robot Manipulators. INTECH,Open Access Publisher.

II. Kordasz, M., Kuczkowski, K. & Sauer, P. 201-Study on possible control algorithms forlower limb rehabilitation system. In: Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE,1–6.

III. Tomachika Ozaki, Tatsuya Suzuki, Takeshi Furuhashi, Shigeru Okuma, YoshikiUchikawa. “Trajectory Control of Robotic Manipulators Using Neural Networks”.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 38, No. 3, June 1991.

IV. Suel Jung, “Neural Network Controllers for Robot Manipulators”. PhD Dissertation, University of California, 1996.

V. Suel Jung, T.C. Hsia, “Neural Network Reference Compensation Technique for Position Control of Robot Manipulators”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 3, pp. 1765-1770, 1996.

VI. Amol A. Khalate, Gopinathan Leena, GoshaidasRay,’An Adaptive Fuzzy Controller for Trajectory Tracking of Robot Manipulator’, Intelligent Control and Automation, 2011, 364-370

VII. Koren Ward,’ Rapid Simultaneous Learning of Multiple Behaviours with a Mobile Robot’ Proc. 2001,Australian Conference on Roboics and Automation ,Sydney,14-15 Nov 2001

VIII. J.Y.S. Luh, Conventional controller design for Industrial robots-a tutorial, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. 1983, 298–316.

IX. Pradeep K. Khosla, Takeo Kanade, Experimental of Evaluation of Nonlinear Feedback and Feedforward Control Schemes for Manipulators, The International Journal of Robotirs Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, February 1988.

X. J.J.E. Slotine, W. Li, Adaptive Manipulator Control: A Case Study, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 33, 1988 , 995– 1003.

XI. Mark W.Spong and M.Vidyasagar, ”Robot Dynamics and control” John Wiley & Sons,2004.

XII. John M Hollerbach , ‘Computer, Brains and the Control Movement’, Manchester Institute of Technology,Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, June 1982.

XIII. Jolly Shah, Dr.S.S.Rattan, Prof. B. C. Nakra,’ Kinematic Analysis of a Planer Robot Using Artificial Neural Network’, International Journal of Robotics and Automation, September 2012, 145-151.

XIV. Dodds ,A two-link manipulator: simulation and control design Advisor: Dr.MahboubBaccouch , University of Nebraska at Omaha Omaha, NE, 68134, March 2012

XV. Duy Nguyen-Tuong, Jan Peters,’ Learning Robot Dynamics for Computed Torque Control using Local Gaussian Processes Regression’, ECSIS Symposium on Learning and Adaptive Behaviors for Robotic Systems, 2008.

XVI. R. K. Mandava and P. R. Vundavilli, “Study on Influence of Hip Trajectory on the Balance of a Biped Robot,” pp. 265–272.

View Download