Authors:
Dr.Muhammad Shabbir Ali,Dr.Shafqat Rasool,Dr. AsifIqbal,Sabahat Parveen ,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2018.12.00012Keywords:
Induction Program,Professional Development,Training of Teachers,Future Modality,Abstract
Induction training program plays vital role for all new mathematics teachers who are recruited. It helps them to increase efficacy level to adhere to the educational life and facilitate the organization with effective performance. This study is the part of wider research to help to investigate evaluation of induction training program for mathematics teachers with the main objective of predicting future modality of professional development on the bases of induction training process. 150 participants, who experienced for induction training program, were selected for this study. These 150 teachers were having vast experience and background in mathematics and statistics. The data were gathered through questionnaire and observation to explore the approaches of induction program for development and its effectiveness. Data were analyzed through statistical techniques of t-test, correlation, ANOVA and regression. The analysis showed significant effect of induction training program on teachers’ development as whole. Induction training program found positive relation with professionalism and strongly predict the professional development of educational organization.Refference:
I. Bush, T. &Middlewood, D., (2005), “Leading and Managing People in Education”. Great Britain: SAGE Publications.
II. Chidambaram, V., Ramachandran, A., Thevar, S.S., (2013), “Study On Efficacy Of Induction Training Programme In Indian Railways Using Factor Analysis”, Verslas: Teorijairpraktika Business: Theory and Practice, Issn 1648-0627 print / Issn 1822-4202.
III. Davey, G., (2004), “Complete Psychology”,Dubai: Book Point Ltd. Hyman, Flanagan, & Smith. (1982). The Hand Book of SchoolPsychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
IV. Fideler, E., &Haselkorn, D., (1999), “Learning The Rope: Urban Teachers Induction Program And Practices In The United States”, Belmont, MA: Recruiting New teachersV. Golrick, L., (2002), “Issue Brief: Improving Teacher Evaluation To Improve Teacher Quality”. New York: NGA Center for Best Practices.
V. Hassel, E., (1999), “ProfessionalDevelopment: Learning From The Best”, Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
VII. Hendricks, K., &Potgieter, J. L., (2012), “A Theory Evaluation Of An Induction Programme”,SA Journal Of Human Resource Management/SA TydskrifVirMenslikehulpbronbestuur, 10(3), Art. #421, 9 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ sajhrm.v10i3.421.
VIII. Ingersoll, R., & Strong, M., (2011), “The Impact Of Induction And Mentoring Programs Fro Beginning Teachers: A Critical Review Of The Research.”Review of Education Research. Vol. 81(2), 201-233. doi: 10.3102/0034654311403323.
IX. Klein, H.J., & Weaver, N.A., (2000), “The Effectiveness Of An Organizational Level Orientation Training Program In The Socialization Of New Hires”. JournalOf Personnel Psychology, 53, 47–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00193.x.
X. Lisa, A., Lim, Y.L, Lew,M.D.N., & Chew, A., (2013), “Impact Of An Intensive Professional Induction Programme OnTeacher Self-Efficacy & Approach To Teaching”,Joint 7th SELF Biennial International Conference and ERAS Conference, Singapore 2013.
XI. Marriam, S.B., (2001), “Andragogy And Self‐Directed Learning: Pillars Of Adult Learning Theory”. New Directions For Adult And Continuing Education, 2001 (89), 3-14.
XII. Moscato, D., (2005), “Using Technology To Get Employees Onboard. Human Resources” Magazine, April, 107–109.
XIII. Olivia, P.F., and Pawlas, G.E., (1997), “Supervision for Today’sSchools”, 5th ed., Longman, New York, NY.
XIV. Peterson, D.A., (1990), “A History Of The Education Of Older Learners. Introduction To Educational”, Gerontology, 1-21.
XV. Rossi, P., Lipsey, M.W., & Freeman, H.E., (2004), “Evaluation.A Systematic Approach”.(7th edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
XVI. Ruhela S.P.,and Singh R.P., (1990), “Trends in Modern IndianEducation”, Uppal Publishing House: New Delhi 395–(1990)XVII. Shulman, L.S., (1987), “Knowledge and teaching: Foundationsof theNew Reform”. Harvard Educational Review. 57(1), 1-22.
XVIII. Smaldino, Sharon E., Lowther, Deborah L., Russel, James D. (2008),“Instructional Technology and Media for Learning”.Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
XIX. Smith Thomas, M., & Ingersoll Richard, M., (2004), “What Are TheEffects Of Induction And Mentoring On Beginning TeachersTurnover?”, American Educational Research Journal. Fall 2004, Vol41, No.3, pp. 681-714.
XX. Wesson, M.J., &Gogus, C.I., (2005), “Shaking Hands With AComputer: An Examination Of Two Methods Of OrganizationalNewcomer Orientation”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 10181026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1018, PMid:16162074.
Author(s): Dr. Muhammad Shabbir Ali, Dr. Shafqat Rasool, Dr. Asif Iqbal, Sabahat Parveen View Download