Ramalakshmi V,Rama Krishna Gupta Potnuru,




Cell Offices,Open plan Offices,Shared rooms,Flex Offices,Personality,Big five traits,Employee performance,


The aim of the study was to investigate how office type influences employee performance, and whether this is different for different personalities. Multiple regression was used in order to test the impact of personality and office type on employee performance. The data was collected from 406 employees working in higher educational institutions, with different office types in Bangalore, Karnataka by using convenience sampling technique. Respondents who were emotionally stable, extroverted and conscientious showed higher level of performance. Specially more emotionally stable respondents showed greater performance, specifically those working in flex offices. Extroverts shown greater performance in shared and cell offices than in open plan and flex offices. Conscientious people shown greater performance in shared and open plan offices.


I. Ashkanasy, N. M., Ayoko, O. B., & Jehn, K. A. (2014). Understanding the
physical environment of work and employee behavior: An affective events
perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(8), 1169-1184.
II. Banbury, S. P., & Berry, D. C. (2005). Office noise and employee
concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential
improvements. Ergonomics, 48(1), 25-37.
III. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and
job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales
representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43.
IV. Benjaafar, S. (2002). Modeling and analysis of congestion in the design of
facility layouts. Management Science, 48(5), 679-704.
V. Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t
Stop Talking. Sat, 10(5), 30.

VI. Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations:
Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal
of Vocational behavior, 31(3), 248-267.
VII. Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R.
(2004). Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work
situation on workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4),
VIII. Danielsson, C. B., & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation to health,
well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment and
Behavior, 40(5), 636-668.
IX. De Croon, E., Sluiter, J., Kuijer, P. P., & Frings-Dresen, M. (2005). The
effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic
review of the literature. Ergonomics, 48(2), 119-134.
X. Dess, G. G., & Robinson Jr, R. B. (1984). Measuring organizational
performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the
privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic management
journal, 5(3), 265-273.
XI. Fried, Y., Slowik, L. H., Ben‐David, H. A., & Tiegs, R. B. (2001).
Exploring the relationship between workspace density and employee
attitudinal reactions: An integrative model. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 74(3), 359-372.
XII. Furnham, A., Eracleous, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009).
Personality, motivation and job satisfaction: Hertzberg meets the Big
Five. Journal of managerial psychology, 24(8), 765-779.
XIII. Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and
contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of vocational
behavior, 55(2), 254-275.
XIV. Haapakangas, A., Hongisto, V., Hyönä, J., Kokko, J., & Keränen, J.
(2014). Effects of unattended speech on performance and subjective
distraction: The role of acoustic design in open-plan offices. Applied
Acoustics, 86, 1-16.
XV. Hackston, J. (2015). Type and work environment. A research study from
XVI. Hesketh, B., Griffin, B., Dawis, R., & Bayl-Smith, P. (2014). Extensions
to the dynamic aspects of the retirement transition and adjustment
framework (RTAF): Adjustment behaviors, work styles, and
identity. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1), 79-91.
XVII. Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Perceptions of
organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between
consciousness and job performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(3),

XVIII. Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance:
The Big Five revisited. Journal of applied psychology, 85(6), 869.
XIX. Jahncke, H., & Halin, N. (2012). Performance, fatigue and stress in openplan
offices: The effects of noise and restoration on hearing impaired and
normal hearing individuals. Noise and Health, 14(60), 260.
XX. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy:
History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of
personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102-138.
XXI. Judge, T. A., Martocchio, J. J., & Thoresen, C. J. (1997). Five-factor
model of personality and employee absence. Journal of applied
psychology, 82(5), 745.
XXII. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of
personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied
psychology, 87(3), 530.
XXIII. Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Jansen, K. J. (2007). Issues of personorganization
fit. Perspectives on organizational fit, 123-153.
XXIV. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as
contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential
relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive
ability. Journal of applied psychology, 86(2), 326.
XXV. Lim, B. C., & Ployhart, R. E. (2004). Transformational leadership:
relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and
maximum contexts. Journal of applied psychology, 89(4), 610.
XXVI. McCusker, J. A. (2003). Individuals and open space office design: The
relationship between personality and satisfaction in an open space work
XXVII. Mehrabian, A. (1977). A questionnaire measure of individual differences
in stimulus screening and associated differences in
arousability. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1(2),
XXVIII. Neubert, S. P. (2004). The Five-Factor Model of personality in the
workplace. Retirado em, 20(04), 2005.
XXIX. Oldham, G. R., & Brass, D. J. (1979). Employee reactions to an open-plan
office: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 267-284
XXX. Ostroff, C. L., & Judge, T. (Eds.). (2007). Perspectives on organizational
fit. Psychology Press.
XXXI. Pejtersen, J. H., Feveile, H., Christensen, K. B., & Burr, H. (2011).
Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan offices—a
national cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Scandinavian journal of
work, environment & health, 376-382.

XXXII. Pullen, W. (2014). Age, office type, job satisfaction and
performance. Work&Place, 3(2), 2014.
XXXIII. Roelofsen, P. (2002). The impact of office environments on employee
performance: The design of the workplace as a strategy for productivity
enhancement. Journal of facilities Management, 1(3), 247-264.
XXXIV. Seddigh, A., Stenfors, C., Berntsson, E., Bååth, R., Sikström, S., &
Westerlund, H. (2015). The association between office design and
performance on demanding cognitive tasks. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 42, 172-181
XXXV. Sinha, K. (2005). How much does personality influence job performance?
XXXVI. Terborg, J. R. (1981). Interactional psychology and research on human
behavior in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 569-
XXXVII. Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: a
social capital perspective. Journal of Applied psychology, 90(5), 1011.
XXXVIII. Walsh, W. B., & Eggerth, D. E. (2005). Vocational psychology and
personality: The relationship of the five-factor model to job performance
and job satisfaction. Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory,
research, and practice, 3, 267-295.
XXXIX. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of
stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation. Journal of comparative neurology
and psychology, 18(5), 459-482.
XL. Yusoff, R. B., Ali, A. M., & Khan, A. (2014). Assessing reliability and
validity of job performance scale among university teachers. Journal of
Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(1), 35-41
XLI. Zábrodská, K., Mudrák, J., Květoň, P., Blatný, M., Machovcová, K., &
Šolcová, I. (2014). Work environment and well-being of academic faculty
in Czech universities: A pilot study. Studia paedagogica, 19(4), 121-144.

View Download