Authors:
Mohammad Hematibahar,Mosarof SK,Dahi S. Vanus,Makhmud Kharun,DOI NO:
https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2025.10.00003Keywords:
Geopolymer Concrete,Steel Rebar,Polyester Fiber,Ultrasonic Testing,Mechanical Properties,Failure Mechanism,Sustainable Construction,Abstract
This article presents a study of the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete reinforced with steel rebar and polyester fibers and compares their performance under different loading conditions. Geopolymer concrete, known for its environmental benefits due to its low CO₂ emissions, has been enhanced with micro silica as an activator and sodium silicate to accelerate the curing process. In this study, non-destructive ultrasonic testing (UT) was used to evaluate the compressive strength, dynamic and static Young's modulus, shear modulus, and pore characteristics. Steel rebar is more suitable for applications requiring high load-bearing capacity, but polyester fibers increase the ductility and resistance of geopolymer concrete to sudden failure by absorbing more energy. The optimum content of polyester fibers is 6%, which ensures the highest flexural load (10,080 kN) and displacement (2.6 mm). Failure analysis revealed shear cracks in samples with steel rebar and vertical cracks in polyester fiber-reinforced samples, indicating different failure mechanisms. The study highlights the trade-off between flexural load and ductility, providing insights for individual applications in sustainable construction. The SADRA algorithm and UT methods have proven their effectiveness in predicting mechanical properties, confirming the potential of geopolymer composites in modern engineering.Refference:
I. Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S. (2017). Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 135, 430–439.
II. Adesina A. (2020). Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental Challenges, 1, 100004.
III. Ahmed HU, Mohammed AS, Faraj RH, Qaidi SMA, Mohammed AA. (2022). Compressive strength of geopolymer concrete modified with nano-silica: experimental and modeling investigations. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e01036.
IV. Amin M, Elsakhawy Y, Abu el-hassan K, Abdelsalam BA. (2022). Behavior evaluation of sustainable high strength geopolymer concrete based on fly ash, metakaolin, and slag. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, e00976.
V. Ashnani MHM, Hasani AM, Hasani E. (2008). A proposal for a comparative assessment process and environmental planning for sustainable rural development in Iran. Journal of Village and Development, 11(1), 77–100.
VI. Assi LN, Deaver E, Elbatanouny MK, Ziehl P. (2016). Investigation of early compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 807–815.
VII. Choi W, Jung K, Jang S, Yun H. (2019). The influence of steel fiber tensile strengths and aspect ratios on the fracture properties of high-strength concrete. Materials, 12, 2105.
VIII. De Araujo Thomaz W, Miyaji DY, Possan E. (2021). Comparative study of dynamic and static Young’s modulus of concrete containing basaltic aggregates. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00645.
IX. Duan P, Yan C, Zhou V. (2017). Compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer blended with silica fume under thermal cycle. Cement and Concrete Composites, 78, 108–119.
X. Esparham A, Vatin NI, Kharun M, Hematibahar M. (2023). A study of modern eco-friendly composite (geopolymer) based on blast furnace slag compared to conventional concrete using the life cycle assessment approach. Infrastructures, 8, 58.
XI. Gabriel F, Prodan D, Sarosi C, Moldovan M, Korniejenko K, Miller L, Fiala L, Nováková I. (2024). Mechanical properties of minibars basalt fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites. Materials, 17, 248.
XII. Hasanzadeh A, Vatin NI, Hematibahar M, Kharun M, Shooshpasha I. (2022). Prediction of the mechanical properties of basalt fiber reinforced high-performance concrete using machine learning techniques. Materials, 15, 7165.
XIII. Hematibahar M, Kharun M, Bhowmik A, Romanovski A. (2025). The SADRA algorithm as a framework for sustainable innovation: a review of case studies on 3D-printed reinforced concrete beam and fiber-reinforced concrete. Engineering Reports, 7, e70208.
XIV. Kharun M, AlAraza HAA, Hematibahar M, AlDaini R, Manoshin AA. (2022). Experimental study on the effect of chopped basalt fiber on the mechanical properties of high-performance concrete. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2559, 050017.
XV. Kharun M, Koroteev D. (2018). Effect of basalt fibres on the parameters of fracture mechanics of MB modifier based high-strength concrete. MATEC Web of Conferences, 251, 02003.
XVI. Kim T, Tae S, Roh S. (2013). Assessment of the CO2 emission and cost reduction performance of a low-carbon-emission concrete mix design using an optimal mix design system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 729–741.
XVII. Kong DLY, Sanjayan JG, Sagoe-Crentsil K. (2007). Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(12), 1583–1589.
XVIII. Li W, Xu J. (2009). Mechanical properties of basalt fiber reinforced geopolymeric concrete under impact loading. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 505, 178–186.
XIX. Liu X, Sun D, Liu D, Meng K, Ni C, Shao Z, Sun L. (2021). Simulation of ultrasonic propagation in porous cellular concrete materials. Construction and Building Materials, 285, 122852.
XX. Medeghini F, Tiberti G, Guhathakurta J, Simon S, Plizzari GA, Mark P. (2025). Fiber orientation and orientation factors in steel fiber-reinforced concrete beams with hybrid fibers: A critical review. Structural Concrete, 26(1), 481–500.
XXI. Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Mehrali M, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ. (2016). High tensile strength fly ash based geopolymer composite using copper coated micro steel fiber. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 629–638.
XXII. Rao PK. (2000). Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
XXIII. Trtnik G, Kavčič F, Turk F. (2009). Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics, 49, 53–60.
XXIV. Turgut P. (2004). Evaluation of the ultrasonic pulse velocity data coming on the field. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurised Components, London, UK.
XXV. Vatin NI, Hematibahar M, Gebre TH. (2024). Impact of basalt fiber reinforced concrete in protected buildings: a review. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10, 1407327.