WEIGHTING THE SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING PRACTICES: A FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Authors:

W. H. W. Mahmood,R. Tukimin,M. Y. Yuhazri,A. M. Kamarul,A. F. I. Himawan,

DOI NO:

https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2026.08.00013

Keywords:

Sustainable Manufacturing Practice,Malaysian Manufacturing Firm,Multi-Criteria Decision Making,Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process,

Abstract

Pressure from customers and stakeholders has forced manufacturing firms to adopt sustainable manufacturing practices into their operations and supply chain management strategies. The three core principles should be considered during their implementation, that consists of economic, environmental, and social. The selection and prioritization of these three core principles become a complex decision-making process. The multi-criteria decision-making techniques can serve as a medium to ease the process of selection and prioritization in a complex system. Thus, this study focuses on prioritizing the sustainable manufacturing practices by determining the weights through Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Malaysian manufacturing sector. The practices were identified through a literature review, questionnaire survey, and consensus obtained from a panel of experts. The findings indicate that environmental was identified as the most important criterion, followed by economic and social. The environmental aspect was emphasized by two: the Environmental Conservation Program and Environmental Recycling and Prevention Program. This finding reveals that the Malaysian manufacturing sector is focusing on ‘green factories’ since this sector consumes a high percentage of final energy use. In addition, this finding will be beneficial to manufacturing practitioners who intend to transform from conventional to sustainable one. The manufacturing practitioner will be facilitated to emphasize the important practice and develop a strategy plan to adopt sustainable manufacturing practices.

Refference:

I. A. Bagherian, C. Laux and M. Kondala. : ‘Transforming quality management: A fuzzy AHP-based approach to Quality 5.0 decision-making’. Quality Management Journal. vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 83-105. 2026. 10.1080/10686967.2025.2579156
II. A. Kumar, S. Luthra, S. K. Mangla and Y. Kazançoğlu. : ‘COVID-19 impact on sustainable production and operations management’. Sustainable Operation and Computer. vol. 1, pp. 1–7. 2020. 10.1016/j.susoc.2020.06.001
III. Suwarna, I. Khasanah and A. Choerudin. : Sustainable operations management: evaluating green supply chain practices and their effect on competitive advantage’. Journal Management & Economics Review (JUMPER). vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 465-478. 2026. 10.59971/jumper.v3i8.863
IV. K. B. Bour, A.J. Asafo, and B.O. Kwarteng. : ‘Study on the effects of sustainability practices on the growth of manufacturing companies in urban Ghana’. Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 6, 2019. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01903
V. Huang, H. Liu, E. Oghenerobor and C. S. Chen. : ‘Collaborating digitalization and green supply chain to promote green development of manufacturing firms–an analysis from a configurational perspective’. Chinese Management Studies. vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2133-2155. 2026. 10.1108/CMS-08-2024-0570
VI. Etemad, S. Nazari-Shirkouhi, S. K. Chaharsooghi and K. Govindan. : ‘Relationship between lean, agile, resilient and green paradigm and sustainable supply chain performance: an empirical investigation’. Industrial Management & Data Systems. pp. 1-36. 2026. 10.1108/IMDS-05-2025-0725
VII. Farrukh Shahzad, H. Liu and H. Zahid. : ‘Industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable performance: do green supply chain collaboration, circular economy practices, technological readiness and environmental dynamism matter?’ Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-22. 2025. 10.1108/JMTM-05-2024-0236
VIII. J. Cohen. : ‘Does the COVID-19 outbreak mark the onset of a sustainable consumption transition?’ Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–3. 2020. 10.1080/15487733.2020.1740472
IX. Z. Yusup, W. H. W. Mahmood, M. R. Salleh and M. R. Muhamad. : ‘The influence factor for the successful implementation of cleaner production: a review’. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), vol. 67, no. 1, 2014. 10.11113/jt.v67.2160
X. N. R. M. Alias, N. Hami and S.M. Shafie. : ‘A case study analysis of sustainable manufacturing practice in Malaysian manufacturing firm’. Journal of Technology and Operations Management. vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 68-77. 2018. 10.32890/jtom2018.13.1.7
XI. S. J. H. Dehshiri. : ‘Sustainable supplier selection based on a comparative decision-making approach under uncertainty’. Spectrum of Operational Research. vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 238-251. 2026. 10.31181/sor31202644
XII. S. Luthra, A. Kumar, E. K. Zavadskas, S. K. Mangla and J. A. Garza-Reyes. : ‘Industry 4.0 as an enabler of sustainability diffusion in supply chain: an analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emerging economy’. International Journal of Production Research. vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1505–1521. 2019. 10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828
XIII. S. Zighan, Z. Alkalha and L. Jum’a. : ‘Barriers to circular economy transitions in emerging markets: insights from the GCC and implications for sustainable development.’ Sustainable Development. vol. 34, pp. 210-225. 2026. 10.1002/sd.70177
XIV. S. H. Abdul-Rashid, N. Sakundarini, R.A.R. Ghazilla and R. Thurasamy. : ‘The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia’. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 182-204. 2017. 10.1108/IJOPM-04-2015-0223
XV. W. H. W. Mahmood, M. N. Ab Rahman and B. M. Deros. : ‘Green supply chain management in Malaysian aero composite industry’. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), vol. 59, pp. 13-17. 2012.

View Download